|
|
  |
 |
  |
Transforming
the Face of Health Professions Through Cultural
& Linguistic Competence Education:
The Role of the HRSA Centers of Excellence
Executive Summary
| Editor’s
note: A Few Words About
Terms Used in this Curriculum Guide
The reader should note that the words
“competence” and “competency”
are used frequently in this document.
Recognizing that the words have similar
meanings, the writers have made a decision
to use “competency” throughout
the document to refer to expertise, and
“competence” to refer to the
ability to perform effectively based on
requisite attitudes, skills, and knowledge.
In addition, the writers hold the view
that cultural competence includes linguistic
competence. In this document we therefore
emphasize the importance of linguistic
competence, because language is inclusive
of culture, and culture is encoded in
language. While we recognize that not
all readers may share this view, we have
chosen to use the term “cultural
and linguistic competence” throughout
the document where it is appropriate.
|
Ensuring cultural and linguistic competency
among health care professionals is a critical
issue that the U.S. health care system must
address in order that all individuals residing
in the United States, regardless of race, ethnicity,
gender, age, language, country of origin, sexual
orientation, religion/spirituality, socioeconomic
class, political orientation, educational/intellectual
levels, and physical/mental ability have access
to and receive quality health care. Cultural
and linguistic competency is not an adjunct
to, but a core component of quality health care.
The focus on cultural and linguistic competency
in this curriculum guide is based on the understanding
that all organizations and individuals operate
within cultural frameworks, and that health
care providers have an obligation to respectfully
consider these cultural frameworks when they
are designing and delivering health care services.
The training of health care professionals should
provide the skills and knowledge that will allow
health care practitioners to incorporate cultural
and linguistic competency into the standard
practice of each particular discipline.
In 1991, the Health Resources Services Administration
(HRSA) of the Federal Department of Health and
Human Services created the Centers of Excellence
(COE) Program. The program was designed to support
excellence in health professional education
for underrepresented minorities (URM) in health
professional schools of medicine, dentistry,
pharmacy, and mental health (Note: Nursing and
allied health professional schools are not included
in the HRSA COE Program but may still find this
curriculum guide useful in developing cultural
and linguistic competency in their institutions).
|
Definition: “Underrepresented minority,” (abbreviated as URM
in this report)
In this report, the term “underrepresented
minority” is defined as racial and
ethnic populations who are underrepresented
in a designated health profession discipline
relative to the percentage of that racial
or ethnic group in the total population.
This definition would include Black or
African American, American Indian or Alaska
Native, Native Hawaiian or other Pacific
Islander, Hispanic or Latino, and any
Asian other than Chinese, Filipino, Japanese,
Korean, Asian Indian, Thai, or Vietnamese/Southeast
Asian.
|
HRSA COEs differ from other Centers of Excellence
programs (such as Women’s COEs) in that
they focus primarily on racially and ethnically
underrepresented minorities in health professional
programs. As a program intended to reduce disparity
in the health care system by increasing the
number of URMs in the health field, the HRSA
COE program was one of the earliest programs
to mandate the teaching of cultural and linguistic
competency content in the educational curricula
among HRSA grant recipients. Section 736 of
the Health Professions Education Partnerships
Act of 1998 encourages COEs “… to
carry out activities to improve the information,
resources, clinical education, curricula and
cultural competence of the graduates of the
schools as it relates to minority health issues.”
Although the COE Program encompasses many goals,
the incorporation of cultural and linguistic
competence training was visionary for its time.
This curriculum guide, Transforming the Face
of Health Professions through Cultural and Linguistic
Competence: The Role of the Centers of Excellence,
was developed by a panel of experts, the Expert
Team, brought together under a contract awarded
by HRSA to Magna Systems, Inc. The extensive
materials and recommendations contained in the
document are intended to assist the COEs in
designing and implementing the required cultural
and linguistic competency educational components
within their specific disciplinary curricula.
The materials are appropriate for training health
care professionals in medicine, dentistry, pharmacy,
social work, psychology and counseling, and
allied fields.
The Expert Team was drawn from the fields of
medicine, nursing, pharmacy, psychology, anthropology,
organizational development, and hospital administration.
Collectively, the team members have significant
and long-term knowledge and experience in the
field of cultural and linguistic competency.
Additionally, each Expert Team member has extensive
experience in teaching cultural and linguistic
competence subject matter to health care professionals.
Over 18 months, this team collaborated in collecting,
reviewing, and organizing the resources in this
curriculum guide under the supervision and direction
of the HRSA’s Division of Health Careers
Diversity and Development, Bureau of Health
Professions.
In developing the curriculum guide, the Expert
Team drew considerably on feedback from COEs.
Several opportunities were identified to initiate
and maintain dialogue with them. The first opportunity
occurred on March 19, 2004, at the annual COE
grantees meeting in Washington, D.C. Two focus
groups, led by Dr. Maria Soto-Greene and Mr.
Beau Stubblefield-Tave, shared information regarding
the project and gathered input from the COE
grantees. The second opportunity to meet with
COE grantees in a formal meeting was on October
6, 2004, in Washington, D.C., at the COE National
technical assistance meeting. Electronic and
paper copies of the draft curriculum guide were
distributed to the COE grantees prior to this
meeting. The input provided by the COE representatives
was extremely useful and helped refine the curriculum
guide. Magna Systems Inc., in collaboration
with the Expert Team, also conducted a comprehensive
assessment of the cultural competence activities
of COE grantees and catalogued “best practices”
for teaching cultural competency in health professions
schools. The Assessment and Promising Practices
Report documents these findings (see
Appendix C).
When developing the material for this curricular
guide, the expert team adopted the following
premises:
- Health care providers have an obligation
to respectfully consider cultural concerns
as they design and deliver health care services.
While it is not possible for any individual
to become thoroughly familiar with the myriad
cultures that exist within the United States,
providers and the institutions that train
them can and must incorporate the general
principles of cultural and linguistic competency
into the standard practice of care.
- The curriculum guide is being made available
to COE grantees as a generic model for use
in guiding the planning, development, implementation,
and evaluation of cultural and linguistic
competency education activities with faculty
and students. The curricular materials can
be used to supplement work already being done
in many COEs, and are not mandatory or intended
to replace existing or planned cultural and
linguistic competency activities.
- The curricular materials focus on generic
concepts and skills that the expert teams
considered to be important. The materials
are not designed to address the varying levels
of cultural and linguistic competence education
that may already be present in different COEs.
- The Expert Team identified certain approaches
and models through collective consensus. However,
these are by no means the only ones available.
Readers will find alternative approaches in
Chapter 10 (Resources) and in the appendices.
- Since COEs do not have a specific mandate
to ensure the cultural and linguistic competency
of the larger institutions of which they are
a part, the primary users of this document
will be COE faculty and other COE academicians;
COE students are intended to be its primary
beneficiaries. It is necessary and important,
however, to acknowledge the significant link
between an organization’s cultural and
linguistic competence and its implementation
of successful cultural and linguistic competence
education. Recognizing this link, the Expert
Team strongly supports a leadership role for
COEs in advocating cultural and linguistic
competence in the larger university communities
in which they reside. Wherever possible, COEs
should encourage collaborative arrangements
around cultural and linguistic competency
subject matter with other university departments.
- Since HRSA COEs were among the earliest
programs to require a cultural and linguistic
competency mandate, many COE directors expressed
the need for guidance on change processes
and gathering support for the concept in a
larger institution. Therefore, although it
may not have a direct link to curriculum development,
it may be beneficial for the COEs to receive
information on organizational change and innovation
from fields outside of health care (contained
in Chapter 3).
Given these facts, the Expert Team encourages
all users of this curriculum guide, Transforming
the Face of Health Professions Through Cultural
and Linguistic Competence Education: The Role
of HRSA Centers of Excellence, to consider it
an evolving document. The Expert Team invites
all users to join with its developers in the
practice of “cultural humility”
(Tervalon and Murray-Garcia, 1998) as we assess
the value of its content and seek to use it
to promote the delivery of culturally competent
health care. Users of this curriculum guide
are urged to engage in participatory and collaborative
processes and to share the lessons they learn
freely. While the information in this curriculum
guide is designed primarily for use by COEs,
it may also be a useful guide and resource for
other institutions and organizations that provide
education and training to health care providers.
The members of the Expert Team hope that the
strategies and resources provided here will
be disseminated appropriately and used by relevant
organizations.
Organization of the Curriculum Guide
This compendium provides practical guidance
in the form of strategies, tools, and resources
for COEs implementing and integrating cultural
and linguistic competency content and methods
into existing academic programs. It also provides
guidance for evaluating cultural and linguistic
competency efforts. The curriculum is organized
into 10 chapters. An overview of the content
of these chapters follows:
Chapter 1: Cultural
and Linguistic Competence and the Centers of
Excellence provides an overview of the COE legislative
mandates, a brief history of COE cultural and
linguistic competency initiatives, and the preliminary
findings of an assessment of past and current
COE cultural and linguistic competency activities.
Chapter 2: The Guiding
Principles and Goals of Cultural and Linguistic
Competence Education presents guiding principles
and goals designed to help COEs maintain a clear
and constructive focus on cultural and linguistic
competency as they negotiate the complexities
of planning, designing, implementing, and evaluating
cultural and linguistic competence training
and education programs into existing curricula.
Chapter3: Strategies
for Success in Implementing Cultural and Linguistic
Competence Education outlines the rationale
for educating for cultural and linguistic competence
and provides an overview of the change management
process. It also examines cultural and linguistic
competence at the organizational level, including
an overview of the National Standards for Culturally
and Linguistically Appropriate Services in Health
Care (the CLAS Standards).
Chapter 4: Creating
a Framework for Cultural and Linguistic Competence
Curriculum discusses some of the methods of
teaching cultural and linguistic competency
and of designing, modifying, and delivering
cultural and linguistic competency curricula.
Specifically, the topics covered in this chapter
are the dimensions of multicultural education
when designing and modifying curricula, incorporating
the process of cultural competence in the delivery
of health care services model, and adhering
to standard principles of instructional systems
development (ISD).
Chapter 5: Curriculum
Content for Cultural and Linguistic Competence
provides guidance and recommendations on content
areas that could be included in a cultural and
linguistic competency curriculum and discusses
curricula models that are being used in various
educational settings to teach cultural and linguistic
competence. The topics covered in this chapter
include learning objectives, recommended core
competencies, recommended core curriculum topics,
and examples of curriculum models. The last
section includes three models used in curriculum
development.
Chapter 6: Delivering
a Cultural and Linguistic Competence Curriculum
describes the processes and strategies that
are used for delivering cultural and linguistic
competence curricula and also provides examples
of how several organizations have implemented
components of culturally competent curricula.
Included is a discussion about developing faculty
commitment, providing a rationale for building
cultural and linguistic professional competencies,
creating a developmental learning path, integrating
cultural and linguistic subject matter into
basic and elective courses, and sample tools
for delivering cultural and linguistic curricula.
Chapter 7: Assessment
and Evaluation of a Culturally Competent Center
of Excellence describes how COEs can make an
initial assessment or benchmark of their cultural
and linguistic competency training and education
activities and then continuously assess organizational
and educational programming. This chapter includes
a discussion on educational assessments and
evaluations, three examples of curriculum evaluation,
organizational assessments and evaluations,
the HRSA domains as a framework for organizational
assessment, and integrated and stand alone evaluation
processes.
Chapter 8: Dissemination
outlines the process for developing a dissemination
plan to share the lessons learned about the
delivery of culturally competent health care
in the community. It describes the importance
of getting support from key stakeholders, such
as university administrators and faculty, and
strategies for achieving the adoption and integration
of cultural and linguistic competency into established
and new courses of study. It discusses the reasons
a COE would disseminate, the mechanisms for
dissemination, and offers examples of an effective
dissemination plan.
Chapter 9: Summary/Next
Steps discusses some caveats, potential issues,
challenges, and barriers to the use of the curriculum
guide. It also summarizes the important recommendations
of the curriculum guide and provides suggestions
for implementation.
Chapter 10: Resources
is a list of cultural and linguistic competency
guidelines, curricula, research reports, organizations,
audio-visual tools, and web sites that may be
helpful to COEs in their efforts to respond
to their cultural and linguistic competency
mandate.
Appendix A: The
Toolbox, provides examples of tools and implementation
strategies developed for teaching cultural and
linguistic competency in health care.
Appendix B is a
glossary of terms related to cultural and linguistic
competency education.
Appendix C contains
the Centers of Excellence Assessment and Promising
Practices Report that describes cultural and
linguistic competence activities of HRSA COE
grantees.
 |