EVIDENCE REVIEW: Severe Combined Immunodeficiency (SCID)
Letter to the Committee from the Evidence Review Group-April 2009
Printer-friendly Committee Report (111 KB)
Prepared for: ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON HERITABLE DISORDERS IN NEWBORNS AND CHILDREN
Final
01/20/2009 (revised 04/29/2009)
Authors:
Ellen Lipstein, Alixandra A. Knapp, James M. Perrin
Evidence Review Group: Chairperson, James M. Perrin, MD
(MGH Center for Child and Adolescent Health Policy)
Committee Members:
Marsha Browning, MD, MPH, MMSc
(Massachusetts General Hospital)
Jennifer Delahaye, BA
(MGH Center for Child and Adolescent Health Policy)
Nancy Green, MD
(Columbia University)
Alex R. Kemper, MD, MPH, MS
(Duke University)
Alixandra Knapp, MS
(MGH Center for Child and Adolescent Health Policy)
Ellen Lipstein, MD
(MGH Center for Child and Adolescent Health Policy)
Lisa Prosser, PhD
(University of Michigan)
Denise Queally, JD
(Consumer Representative)
Sienna Vorono, BA
(MGH Center for Child and Adolescent Health Policy; Brown Medical School)
This review was made possible by subcontract number SC-07-028 to Massachusetts General Hospital, Center for Child and Adolescent Health Policy under prime contract number HHSP23320045014XI to Altarum Institute, from the Maternal and Child Health Bureau (MCHB) (Title V, Social Security Act), Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA), U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS).
Table of Contents
i. Abbreviations Used
I. Overview
II. Rationale for Review
III. Objectives of Review
IV. Main Questions
V. Conceptual Framework
VI. Methods
VII. Results
VIII. Summary
IX. References
X. Appendix A- SCID Evidence Tables
XI. Appendix B- Conflict of Interest Form
XII. Appendix C- Letter and Questions Sent to SCID Experts
XIII. Appendix D- Letter and Questions Sent to SCID Advocacy Groups
i. Abbreviations used
ACHDNC
ACTB
ADA deficiency
BMT
B+ SCID
B- SCID
CD Antigens
CI
CIBMTR
CMV
DNA
ELISA
ERG
ERT
G-CSF
GVHD
HLA
HSCT
IgA
IgG
IgM
IL-7
IVIG
JAK
MeSH
MMRD
MUD
NIAID
NK
PEG
PHA
RID
SCID
SCIDA
TREC
USIDNET
XSCID
c |
Advisory Committee on Heritable Disorders in Newborns and Children
Gene symbol for beta-actin Adenosine deaminase deficiency
Bone marrow transplant
Subgroup of severe combined immunodeficiency in which B lymphocytes are present
Subgroup of severe combined immunodeficiency in which B lymphocytes are absent
Cluster of differentiation, nomenclature of leucocyte molecules
Confidence interval Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research
Cytomegalovirus
Deoxyribonucleic acid
Enzyme-Linked ImmunoSorbent Assay
Evidence review group
Enzyme replacement therapy
Granulocyte-colony stimulating factor
Graft versus host disease Human leukocyte antigen
Hematopoietic stem cell transplant
Immunoglobulin A Immunoglobulin G
Immunoglobulin M
Interleukin 7
Intravenous immunoglobulin
Janus kinase
National Library of Medicine medical subject heading
Mismatched related donor
Matched unrelated donor
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases
Natural killer
Polyethylene glycol
Phytohemagglutinin
Related identical
Severe Combined Immunodeficiency
Severe Combined Immunodeficiency, Athabascan-type
T-cell receptor excision circles
United States Immunodeficiency Network
X-Linked Severe Combined Immunodeficiency
Common cytokine receptor chain |
I. Overview
Severe Combined Immunodeficiency (SCID) is a group of disorders characterized by the absence of both humoral and cellular immunity. Reported incidence is approximately 1/100,000 (Chan, Puck 2005, McGhee et al. 2005). Currently at least 15 genes are known to cause SCID when mutated (Puck, SCID Newborn Screening Working Group 2007). Although disease presentation varies (Buckley et al. 1997), as protection from maternal antibodies wanes during the first months of life, infants with SCID develop infections due to both common and opportunistic pathogens (Buckley et al. 1997). Treatment and prevention of infections can prolong life but are not curative actions (Buckley et al. 1999).
Early receipt of hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT), prior to the onset of severe infections, offers the best chance of cure (Buckley et al. 1999). Although family history leads to early detection of some infants, the majority of infants with SCID are not detected until they develop clinical symptoms such as recurrent infections, failure to thrive and infection with opportunistic organisms (Buckley et al. 1997). The apparent value of early HSCT has led to a search for methods for pre-symptomatic identification of infants with SCID, including possible population-based newborn screening.
II. Rationale for Review
The Advisory Committee on Heritable Disorders in Newborns and Children has directed the Evidence Review Group to produce this report for the nominated condition of SCID. SCID has been nominated for the following reasons:
- Without treatment, SCID leads to death in early childhood.
- Earlier treatment, particularly before the onset of lung infection, decreases the mortality and morbidity associated with SCID and with HSCT for SCID.
- Methods to screen infants for SCID, using quantitative PCR for T-cell receptor excision circles (TREC), have been developed.
III. Objectives of review
The objective of this review is to provide information to the Advisory Committee on Heritable Disorders in Newborns and Children (ACHDNC) to guide recommendations regarding screening newborns for SCID. Specifically, the Evidence Review Group’s (ERG) goal was to summarize the evidence available from published studies, as well as critical unpublished data available from key investigators in the field.
IV. Main questions
We sought to answer the following questions, with a particular emphasis on the questions related to screening and the benefits of early treatment.
- What is the natural history of SCID and are there clinically important phenotypic or genotypic variations?
- What is the prevalence of SCID and its variations?
- What methods exist to screen newborns for SCID? How accurate are those methods? What are their sensitivity and specificity? What methods exist to diagnose individuals with positive screens?
- What benefit does treatment, particularly pre-symptomatic, confer?
- What are the potential harms or risks associated with screening, diagnosis or treatment?
- What costs are associated with screening, diagnosis, treatment and the failure to diagnose in the newborn period?
By answering these questions we hoped to provide the ACHDNC with answers to broader questions related to SCID screening. Specifically:
- Do current screening tests effectively and efficiently identify cases of SCID?
- Does pre-symptomatic or early symptomatic intervention in newborns or infants with SCID improve health outcomes? In other words, does early identification lead to better outcomes?
- What is the cost-effectiveness of newborn screening for SCID?
- What critical evidence appears lacking that may inform screening recommendations for SCID?
V. Conceptual framework
The conceptual framework illustrated below outlines the salient factors when considering newborn screening for any disorder, SCID in the case of this review. Children will develop SCID regardless of whether or not they are screened. The key decision points, therefore, are whether to screen newborns and what treatment to pursue for affected children. At either decision point, children may experience benefits from the decision but also are at risk of adverse effects, including false-positive or false-negative screening results and significant treatment side-effects. The combination of the baseline risk for SCID and the effects of the screening and treatment decisions lead to a state of health.
Figure 1- Conceptual Framework.
next page: Methods
 |