Skip Navigation HRSA - U.S Department of Health and Human Services, Health Resources and Service Administration HHS
Home
Questions
Order Publications
 
Grants Find Help Service Delivery Data Health Care Concerns About HRSA
Performance Review
 

Clinical Measures for Health Center Grantee Performance Reviews –
Calendar Year 2006


Performance Measure: # 7c   Activity Code(s): H 80  
Percentage of adults with abnormal breast cancer (mammogram) screening results, for which referral and/or treatment has been initiated within 30 days.
 
Definition:
Numerator:

Persons in the denominator for whom follow-up assessment – such as notification, referral, scheduling of follow up appointment, treatment, etc. – have been documented and initiated within 30 days of test completion.
Denominator: Total number of patients with an abnormal colon cancer (colonoscopy) screening test during calendar year.
Unit & Text: numerator count/denominator count x 100 = %
 
National Benchmark:

There are no benchmarks for follow up of abnormal reports.

The Health Disparities Collaborative benchmark:
95% goal for having documented notification of results within 30days.
http://healthdisparities.net/hdc/Library/7-19-2005.7366/CancerMeasures_Mar05.pdf

HEDIS Annual Report on Health Care Quality: 2005
http://www.ncqa.org/docs/SOHCQ_2005.pdf (page 36)

Data Sources
and Data Issues:

From registry or EHR/EMR if available.

If chart audit, then sample from the sample frame of persons meeting denominator criteria.

 
Background/significance of measure:
Colorectal cancer is the third most common cancer among both men and women in the United States. It is the second leading cause of cancer deaths in the U.S. (behind lung cancer), accounting for about 10% of all cancer deaths. Over 56,000 deaths from colorectal cancer are expected to occur in the U.S. in 2005.2

Colorectal cancer develops slowly and is often asymptomatic in its early stages. In addition, less than one-fourth of colorectal cancer cases are associated with a family history of the disorder.3 These characteristics of the disease make early detection particularly important and effective.

Colonoscopy is one of the most effective screening tools for the prevention and treatment of colorectal cancer. The American Cancer Society currently recommends colonoscopy every 10 years starting at age 50 for asymptomatic adults at average risk for colorectal cancer and more frequently for those at increased or high risk. Overall, it has been shown that colonoscopic polypectomy (removal of polyp found by this screening process) lowers the incidence of colorectal cancers by 50%-90% (Medline); furthermore, if detected early (stage 1), 85-95 percent of patients with colorectal cancer can be cured. Unfortunately, if detected in a later stage, the average 5-year survival rate is 50 percent or less.4

The US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) strongly recommends that clinicians screen men and women 50 years of age or older for colorectal cancer:
http://www.ahrq.gov/clinic/3rduspstf/colorectal/colorr.pdf

For more info on Cancer screening see:
http://www.cancer.gov/cancertopics/screening &
http://www.cancer.gov/cancertopics/pdq/screening

For information on this measure, see:
http://healthdisparities.net/hdc/Library/7-19-2005.7366/CancerMeasures_Mar05.pdf
http://www.ncqa.org/docs/SOHCQ_2005.pdf (page 36)
http://www.healthdisparities.net/hdc/html/collaboratives.topics.cancer.aspx

For information on treatment, see:
http://www.cancer.gov/cancertopics/treatment &
http://www.cancer.gov/cancertopics/pdq/adulttreatment

Screening has been proven to prevent and/or ameliorate the course of a number of serious medical conditions. Screening for colorectal, breast, and cervical cancers can reduce illness and death through early detection of cancers and pre-cancers. Colorectal, breast, and cervical cancers accounted for nearly a fifth of all U.S. cancer deaths in 2001, according to the CDC’s National Center for Health Statistics. .

This measure examines the continuity of care at health center grantees for cancer screening including provider education and adherence, patient outreach and health education, follow up, referral, and appointment systems for the existing cancer screening protocol. The measure ties into GPRA Measure II.A.3

Other guidelines and references:

  1. http://www.cancer.org/colonmd/pdfs/fact_sheet.pdf
  2. http://www.cancer.org/colonmd/pdfs/ColonCancerFactSheet2005.doc
  3. http://www.cancer.gov/cancertopics/pdq/genetics/colorectal
  4. Redaelli A, Cranor CW, Okano GJ, Reese PR. Screening, prevention and socioeconomic costs
    associated with the treatment of colorectal cancer. Pharmacoeconomics. 2003;21(17):1213- 1238.