The javascript used on this site for creative design effects is not supported by your browser. Please note that this will not affect access to the content on this web site.
Skip Navigation
H H S Department of Health and Human Services
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
Health Resources and Services Administration

A-Z Index  |  Questions? 

Cervical Cancer Screening

Part 1: Introduction

Part 2: Characteristics for Success: Cervical Cancer Screening

Part 3: Implementation of Clinical Quality Measure: Cervical Cancer Screening

Part 4: Improvement Strategies: Cervical Cancer Screening

Part 5: Holding the Gains and Spreading Improvement

Part 6: Supporting Information


Part 4: Improvement Strategies: Cervical Cancer Screening 

The actual improvement process is composed of three steps that respond to the following questions:

  1. What changes can an organization make?
  2. How can an organization make those changes?
  3. How can an organization know the changes caused an improvement?
What Changes Can an Organization Make?

It is important to understand that improvement requires change, but not all change results in improvement. Considering all of the possible changes that can be made to health care systems, considerable effort has been dedicated to creating various quality improvement strategies providing a framework that organizes possible changes into logical categories. Frameworks for change in health care quality improvement are known as quality models and have been tested to guide change. In fact, considering that there are limited resources to dedicate to improvement, most organizations adopt one or more quality models to guide their improvement efforts. There is not a right or wrong approach, and there are many areas of overlap in quality models. Experienced quality improvement teams often use multiple strategies to overcome challenges as they progress. Two approaches often used by teams that are working to improve performance on Cervical Cancer Screening Screening include the Care Model and the Critical Pathway approaches.

The case study continues….

The Case Study: The Improvement Journey 

  1. Care Model Approach: Implementing the changes described in the Care Model is a proven method to improve care delivery. The Care Model is an organizational framework for change and is organized into six domains:
    1. Organization of Health Care
    2. Clinical Information Systems
    3. Delivery System Design
    4. Decision Support
    5. Community
    6. Self-Management Support

    Changes within these domains can effectively leverage transformation of a current reactive care system to one that better supports proactive or preventive care. If an organization does not have general experience with the Care Model, reading about the Care Model Exit Disclaimer. before proceeding is recommended. The Care Model recognizes that preventive care is ongoing and requires more proactive care than the health care system often provides. The Care Model is implemented to improve care by working in six domains, defined below, that transform the way care is delivered:

    Community-To improve the health of the population, a health care organization reaches out to form powerful alliances and partnerships with State programs, local agencies, schools, faith organizations, businesses, and clubs.

    Organization of Health Care-A health care system can create an environment in which organized efforts to improve the preventive care of people takes hold and flourishes.

    Self Management-Effective self management is very different from telling patients what to do. Patients have a central role in determining their care and one that fosters a sense of responsibility for their own health.

    Delivery System Design-Delivery of patient care requires not only to determine what care is needed, but to clarify roles and tasks to ensure the patient receives the care; all clinicians who take care of a patient have centralized and up-to-date information about the patient's status, and make follow-up a part of their standard procedures.

    Decision Support-Treatment decisions need to be based on explicit, proven guidelines supported by at least one defining study. A health care organization integrates these guidelines into the day-to-day practice of primary care providers in an accessible and easy-to-use manner.

    Clinical Information System-A registry, that is, an information system that can track individual patients and populations of patients, is a necessity when managing chronic illness or preventive care.


    Definitions above adapted from the Institute for Healthcare Improvement Web site (28)

    Figure 4.1: The Care Model.
    Figure 4.1: The Care Model

    In Table 4.1: Care Model Key Changes, key changes are presented that have been used successfully to improve cervical cancer screening within the Care Model framework.  

     

    Table 4.1: Care Model Key Changes
    CommunityOrganization of Health CareSelf ManagementDelivery System DesignDecision SupportClinical Information System
    Partner with local specialists to provide free screenings for uninsured womenIntegrate Care Model and Model for Improvement into organization's infrastructureShort education sessions with patients to explain the purpose and procedure of screeningEmpower Mas to assess need for screening and make appointments for patients to have screenings done when presenting for another purposeEnsure that providers and other staff receive education regarding ethnic/cultural diversityUse database or information system to identify special needs of ethnic/cultural patients in various areas, such as interpreter services, preferred language for written materials, and primary language spoken
    Partner with local health department and family planning agency to ensure access to screening for all womenConduct initial and ongoing organizational cultural competency self-assessmentsEnsure that patients get relevant information and education; make appointments for screenings, and ensure follow-up on results is done onsite as much as possibleMas or nursing staff discuss cancer screening and address apprehension with patients (if appropriate) before PCP sees patientUse a cancer screening card that lists screening tests and dates performed; this prompts PCP to discuss during patient visitTrack and review measures regularly and provide systematic feedback
    Partner with AmeriCorps to do outreach to patients, such as, calls to remind them of their appointments for screenings; patient education on various screening tests, and follow–ups if patients missed or rescheduled appointmentsIntegrate cultural and linguistic competence-related measures into their internal audits, performance improvement programs, patient satisfaction assessments, and outcome-based evaluationsEasy-to-read instructions and patient education tools with pictures concerning cancer screening, procedures, and follow-upTransportation is provided or arranged for patients who need itProvider report cards serve as important and useful tools for providing feedback on quality of care being providedUse the registry or HER to generate reminders and care-planning tools for individual patient
    Create links to referral sites and screening centers for follow-up of abnormal testsSenior leadership makes quality improvement and Care Model a priority within organization and cultivates an organization of excellenceDevelop or adopt instruction pamphlets and patient education tools to facilitate discussions and patient self-managementAssess comfort of gyn examination rooms and optimize conditionsAdopt and train clinical staff regarding evidence-based guidelines and practices for testing and screening throughout organizationContinuous monitoring of data to help create and facilitate excitement about the work
    Recruit interns (paid or voluntary) from local schools, community organizations, and volunteer centersDetermine most appropriate process for screening at all levels and institutionalize it into the entire system, including competency testing, audits, job descriptions, annual reviews and performance appraisals, workflows, policies, procedures, scheduling, and budgetary impact for overall system reengineeringSend personalized letters to patients that alert them of need for screening--especially for patients who do not come in often for careDevelop or adopt patient release forms for patients who go to other providers for screening or follow-up to ensure that test results are provided to the organizationPrompts and reminders for providers, including chart-based and computerized reminders, audits, and feedback to improve cancer screeningPerform quality assurance checks to ensure that data is being captured and entered appropriately
    This toolkit is meant as a guide to help organize ideas, but is also designed to allow flexibility for creative planning.

     

    Note: Improvement strategies are not “one-size-fits-all.” An organization may choose to adapt and refine a tool to assist improvement for the measure, Cervical Cancer Screening. Testing the measure before fully implementing it offers a way to try something new and modify it before additional resources are spent.

    The case study continues….

    The Case Study: The QI Team 

  2. Critical Pathway Approach: As with all critical pathways, good performance relies on many different systems and processes working together efficiently. An organization is encouraged to map its own critical pathway for Cervical Cancer Screening or refer to the schematic in Figure 4.2. ] Often when a QI team maps its pathways, it readily can see how complex each step is. It is common for different team members to do the same step differently. Workflow inefficiencies become clear when an organization visualizes how each step is completed and the interdependencies among the steps. Some teams are overwhelmed by the possibilities of changes that can be made in their systems; others focus only on a specific group of factors.

    One way to organize the factors that have an impact on the systems is to consider that some are controlled by the patient, others are primarily controlled by the care team, and still others are inherent in the system of care delivery. All three sets of changes must be considered to improve systems of care. In general, these categories can be defined as follows:

    • Patient changes-efforts to support self management, patient engagement, and navigation of the care system
    • Care team changes-changes in job duties or workflows that assist to retain patients in care and ensure timely evidence-based cervical cancer screening
    • Health system changes-changes that have an impact on how care is delivered, independent of who delivers it

    A team should use the steps along the critical pathway to target improvements. For this measure, Cervical Cancer Screening, influences on performance begin by ensuring that female patients are screened appropriately for risk factors for cervical cancer beginning in their twenties.

    An organization should ensure that patients are appropriately educated regarding the importance of regularly updating the health care team about their risks and have enough knowledge to participate in shared decision making as they grow older. Providing education to patients also affords an organization the opportunity to assess patient barriers to testing, such as, lack of insurance or cost. Successful organizations have often aligned resources in the community for Pap test screening at a reduced cost for patients creating a true partnership in patient care.

    An organization can think through each part of the critical pathway in turn, teasing out what happens and what could be improved. In Table 4.2, changes that have worked for other QI teams are matched with the part of the system on which they have the most impact. These ideas are not meant to be inclusive, but to start a dialogue of what may improve each part of the critical pathway in an organization, and thus improve it overall. 

    Changes That Work 

    Table 4.2: Sample Changes That Work That are linked to the critical pathway for cervical cancer screening.

    Table 4.2: Sample Changes That Work
    Area of Critical PathwayPatient ChangesCare Team ChangesHealth System Changes
    Female patients aged 21 years & older present for careEducate patients with resources that describe cervical cancer & age- appropriate screening

    Assess barriers to cervical cancer screening; address barriers in partnership with patients
    Promote cervical cancer screenings (Pap tests) for patients aged 21 to 64 years every patient encounter

    Ensure messaging from the care team regarding importance of screening based on age & risk

    Query electronic medical records or billing system monthly (female patients aged 21 to 64 years)

    Prompts for cervical cancer screening (pap tests for patients 21 to 64 years) due at point of care – registry and flow sheets

    Implement standing orders for screening per protocol

    Cervical cancer screening and risk assessmentEducation for patients on importance of cervical cancer screening including guidelines & risk assessment

    Assess patient beliefs for screenings

    Assist with appropriate self-management goal setting and strategies to overcome barriers

    Consider health literacy screening
    Designate care team member to outreach to patients due for cervical cancer screening

    Culturally-competent education for patients to support cervical cancer screening

    Continued education for age- appropriate screening and risk assessment

    Providers should agree on guidelines so that care among providers is congruent
    CME's for providers that support culturally-competent screening and education supporting appropriate cervical cancer screening

    Display culturally-appropriate posters and brochures in patient areas to encourage patients to talk to providers about cervical cancer screening and pap test

    Clinical guidelines for cervical cancer risk assessment and age-appropriate screenings
    Shared decision making based on riskEducation for patients on importance of cervical cancer screening, including guidelines in a culturally-competent manner and at appropriate literacy levelShare clinical guidelines in patient-friendly format

    Share screening procedure

    Ensure screening is ordered when it is due, regardless of reason for visit

    Document current care plan and share copy with the patient

    Ensure access for patients who need additional support

    Attempt to hire clinicians to accommodate language needs and gender preference of patients served
    Provide list of free or low-cost pap test and cervical cancer screening services

    Develop routine cervical cancer screening referrals (where appropriate) for female patients 21 to 64 years of age
    Meets cervical cancer screening guidelinesProvide evidence-based guidelines for cervical cancer screening including risk assessments

    Consider health literacy screening
    Continued education for age- appropriate screening and risk assessment

    Providers should agree on guidelines so that care among providers is congruent
    Clinical guidelines for cervical cancer risk assessment and age-appropriate screenings

    Tools to support colon cancer screening

    Providers have continuing educational opportunities to stay current with appropriate interventions

    Prompts for screening are not turned off when test is ordered, but rather when results received
    Pap test not indicated or patient declinedEducation for patients on importance of cervical cancer screening including guidelines and risk factors

    Assist with appropriate self management
    Continued education for age- appropriate screening and risk assessment

    Providers should agree on guidelines so that care among providers is congruent
    Patient routinely given documentation of current care plan

    Tools to support cervical cancer screening

    Providers have continuing educational opportunities to stay current with appropriate interventions

    Display culturally-appropriate posters and brochures in patient areas to encourage patients to talk to providers about screening
    Pap test completedEducation on follow-up & importance of receiving test results once completeDocument current care/treatment plan and share copy with patient

    Recall system/log to ensure screening complete
    Implement patient follow-up and recall system to ensure screening follow- through

    Clear procedures for how screening results are routed once received – usually to a provider or another health professional who can act on the results by protocol
    Results received and routed to appropriate staffEducation for patients on importance of receiving test resultsEnsure outreach to patient with test results and achieving targets per guidelines; no news is good news strategy for notifying patients about pap test results is not aligned with good care

    Set clear expectations for follow-up
    Monitor patient contacted with results

    Set data tracking and evaluation systems for timely patient contact

    Implement a tracking system that monitors screening results and prompts if results not logged as expected
    Positive findings?Education on the importance of treatment of positive findings

    Resources for patient support
    General referral for treatment

    Help patients to make follow-up appointments

    Assess current care plan, barriers to following care plan, and collaborate with patient on care plan modifications
    Partnerships with specialist for low-cost interventions

    Culturally-competent education materials readily available for specialist referral
    Referral for appropriate care & treatmentSchedule self-management support between visits as indicated

    Ensure patients get the relevant information, education, and make appointments for follow-up care
    Set clear expectations for follow-up

    Assess current care plan, barriers to following care plan, and collaborate with patient on care plan modifications

    Patient satisfaction survey on navigating system
    Ensure patient receives guidance about access to the practice with interim concerns

    Financial considerations and referral source for low-cost interventions

    Implement Patient Satisfaction Survey for Breast & Cervical Health Screening Navigation
    This toolkit is meant as a guide to help organize ideas, but is also designed to allow flexibility for creative planning.

     

    Improvement strategies are not “one-size-fits-all.” While an organization may choose to adapt and refine a tool to assist improvement for the measure, Cervical Cancer Screening, testing the measure before fully implementing it offers a way to try something new and modify it before additional resources are spent.
How Can an Organization Make Those Changes?

Earlier in this module, examples are provided of changes (Critical Pathway and Care Model) that have led to improved organizational systems of care and better patient health outcomes. Because every change is not necessarily an improvement, changes must be tested and studied to determine whether the change improves the quality of care. This concept is addressed in detail in the Testing for Improvement module.

It is important that these changes be tested in the context of an organization's staff, current processes, and patients. The goal is that the change results in lasting improvements within an organization.

Organizations commonly use tools to manage change as they work to improve their systems. For a comprehensive discussion of change management, refer to the Testing for Improvement and Redesigning a System of Care to Promote QI modules. Here are a couple of tools that are worth mentioning in the context of this measure:

  1. Small tests of change Model for Improvement and PDSA (Plan-Do-Study-Act)
  2. Process mapping
  3. Model for Improvement

    The Model for Improvement (29) identifies aim, measure, and change strategies by asking three questions:

    Figure: AIM Measure Change.
    Figure: AIM Measure Change

    These questions are followed by the use of learning cycles to plan and test changes in systems and processes. These are referred to as PDSA (Plan-Do-Study-Act) cycles. The PDSA Cycle is a test-and-learning method for discovering effective and efficient ways to change a current process. In Figure 4.3: The PDSA Cycle, the graphic provides a visual of the PDSA process:
    Figure 4.3: The PDSA Cycle.
    Figure 4.3: The PDSA Cycle


    An organization focusing its improvement efforts on Cervical Cancer Screening for its patients benefits from implementing PDSAs to test change processes that have an impact on access to preventive care. Those organizational processes tested may focus on outreach, operational procedures, or patient education interventions ensuring that patients have timely access to care. A few examples of such processes relating to Cervical Cancer Screening are listed below:

    • What system is in place to provide patients with timely reminders regarding cervical cancer screening?
    • What are the assigned roles, duties, and tasks for planned visits to a multidisciplinary care team? Are members of the team cross-trained?
    • Does the patient population understand its specific role in cervical cancer screening or is there an opportunity for education?
    • Is there an opportunity to educate the community on the importance of cancer screening including cervical cancer in a group visit setting?
    • Are there cultural, linguistic, and literacy barriers that the organization may need to address?

    As an organization plans to test a change, it should specify the who, what, where, and when so that all staff know their roles clearly. Careful planning results in successful tests of change. Documentation of what happened – the S or study part of the PDSA – is also important. This can help a team to understand the impact of changes to a process as unanticipated consequences may occur.

    Tips for Testing Changes

    • Keep the changes small and continue testing
    • Involve care teams that have a strong interest in improving cancer screening
    • Study the results after each change. All changes are not improvements; do not continue testing something that does not work!
    • If stuck, involve others who do the work even if they are not on the improvement team
    • Make sure that overall aims are improving; changes in one part of a complex system sometimes have an adverse effect in another
  • Process Mapping

    Process mapping is another valuable tool that an organization focused on improvement often uses. A process map provides a visual diagram of a sequence of events that result in a particular outcome. Many organizations use this tool to evaluate a current process and again when restructuring a process.

    The purpose of process mapping is to use diagramming to understand the current process; i.e., how a process currently works within the organization. By looking at the steps, their sequence, who performs each step, and how efficiently the process works, a team can often visualize opportunities for improvement.

    Process mapping can be used before or in conjunction with a PDSA cycle. Often, mapping out the current process uncovers unwanted variation. In other words, different staff may perform the process differently, or the process is changed on certain days or by specific providers. By looking at the process map, a team may be able to identify gaps and variation in the process that have an impact on cervical cancer screening.

    The case study continues….

    The Case Study: PDSA Cycles in Action

    Process mapping, when used effectively, can identify opportunities for improvement, and support testing changes in the current system of care. Additional information, including tools and resources to assist an organization in adapting process mapping as an improvement strategy within its organization, can be found in the Redesigning a System of Care to Promote QI module.

How Can an Organization Know That Changes Caused an Improvement?

Measures and data are necessary to answer this question. Data is needed to assess and understand the impact of changes designed to meet an organization's specified aim. Measurement is essential in order to be convinced that changes are leading to improvement. Organizations that have experienced successful improvement efforts found that data, when shared with staff and patients outside the core improvement team, led to the spread of improvement strategies, in turn generating interest and excitement in the overall quality improvement process.

Measures are collected prior to beginning the improvement process and continue on a regularly scheduled basis throughout the improvement program. Once an organization reaches its specified goal, frequency of data collection may be reduced. Additional information regarding frequency of data collection, tracking, and analyzing data can be found in the Managing Data for Performance Improvement module.




You will need Adobe Acrobat® Reader™ to view PDF files located on this site. If you do not already have Adobe Acrobat® Reader™, you can download here for free. Exit Disclaimer